Sight Unseen
By Ivan Quaroni
“Intuition is the perception of the invisible, just as perception is the intuition of the visible.” (Nicolás Gómez Dávila)
Viviana Valla’s artistic research is based on perception without doubt. She experiments in a hugely different, and more subtle, way from the Kinetic and Op Art of the Sixties. These artistic movements created attractive devices to make the audience aware of the “vision” problem. They underlined the role of knowledge and senses in the interpretation of images.
The time of fruition is rather important in Viviana Valla’s work. Her works are not immediately comprehensible, because they are based on a complex stratification mechanism. Through gradual additions and revealing removals, she establishes an elaborate web of relations of signs, structures and substances between the different layers of the image.
This is a glazing process, of course, but here colours, signs and shapes are assembled together with the collage of tissues, post-it, tapes, print-cuts covered by layers of liquid acrylics. The result is clear and obscure at the same time, it does show the final image, a distinctly abstract diagram as a consequence of a complex productive process. Slow perception is necessary. Time becomes an useful tool to avoid easy conclusions and it helps reading the work in the same way we would read any image. It is a combination of more or less organised shapes on a surface. In Viviana Valla’s work is present an invisible morphology, which is an essential part of the image. All we do not see, such as the pictorial adjustments and the collage erased by the artist during the stratification process, is not only the skeleton of her work, but is also its own raison d'être. The settled formal subjects partially emerge from the work’s surface, they are part of a gradual rearrangement of chaotic elements through continuous additions and exclusions . The result is a painting characterised by micro-relieves rhythmically shaking the surface with slight variegations.
It is not possible to re-trace the sequence of interventions on the canvas. The artist acts in a erratic way, claryfing her project step by step.
Basically, the plan and realisation of artistic elements in Viviana Valla’s research are structured through an apparently analytical and minimal system which, actually, hides an intuitive and emotional origin. “My work begins from geometrical abstract art”, says the artist, “I use atypical substances, but also signs, collages and recyclable materials suggesting an intimate dimension, a kind of diary, more cryptic and hermetic throughout the years.”
Behind the formal neatness and integrity of these works, there is a gathering of elusive thoughts, immediate ideas and sudden inspirations translated in a clear and extensive language by the artist. The final effect of the expressive cooling of interior fire.
Also the choice of colours, tenuous tints and delicate tones, helps the process of softening the emotional aspect, thanks to the use of very liquid acrylics producing transparency effects. It is possible to feel a kind of ongoing emotional censure, a discrete removal of poetic messages trapped by a net polygonal shapes and Cartesian volumes.
The work’s space, because of its various layers and subtle superficial irregularities, sometimes crossovers its own borders. It happens especially with installations. Signs, traces, lines conquer portions of walls, floors and ceilings, suggesting the idea of continuing or increasing ad libitum the pictorial vocabulary of the artist.
Expansion and exclusion, removals and allusions follow one another in Viviana Valla’s painting. They activate a slightly seducing game, entrapping the observer who tries to understand the veiled contents through geometrical appearance.
The title of the exhibition, Sight Unseen, refers to the leitmotiv recently investigated by the artist, the dualism between accumulation and exclusion, stratification and concealing. The paintings do look like a closed box. Their seal is generally a white shape, which hides a relevant part of the surface and, at the same time, it seals the lower pictorial layers.
These white polygons are obtained through the addition of various layers of acrylic gesso in polygonal shapes. Recently, these shapes have been dissolved by brush strokes or fragmented in modules.
White, as a metaphore of cancellation, looks like bringing back the initial emptiness of the canvas. Of course, the final layer of gesso is not the same as the white background of the beginning. Something happened between one phase and the other.
The eternal fight between the artist and her language has taken place, a hand-to-hand examination of her own expressive tools.
How can you express through painting what you can’t say through words? How is it possible to say something so elusive that no language can express it – especially in the random pratice of painting -, such as ideas and epiphanies which sometimes appear in the mind of the artist?
Perhaps Viviana Valla is aware of this unavoidability. She may transform it in a subject, in a concept at the base of her research. Her works become so the sight unseen of the title, closed boxes containing warnings, predictions and perpetually denied messages. Like in the best aniconic traditions, her abstract way of painting shows all the properties belonging to an ambiguous language, full of clues and omissions. There again, as proposed by Claude Lévi Strauss, “Language is a form of human reason, which has its internal logic of which man knows nothing.”
After all, the enigma of Viviana Valla’s paintings can only find its solutions through the attentive eye of the observer or, even better, through his ability to understand the meaning of shape itself, the sense of sensitive substance.
Uncertainty Principle
Ivan Quaroni
"There is no abstract art. You always start with something. Afterward you can remove alltraces of reality."
(Pablo Picasso)
"An image breaks the borders defined by concept in order to define and contain it. Spiritmust realize this, whether it likes it or not, or it will succumb under phenomena."
(ErnstJunger)
In recent times, Italian art developed a new aniconic and polysemous sensibility expressed through several media, from painting to sculpture and installation, in discontinuity with the codes belonging to geometrical abstraction. In the history of art, the abstract process often represented an arrival point, intended as an evolution or improvement of the pictorial language. Many Italian abstract painters like Alberto Magnelli, Manlio Rho, Arturo Bonfanti and Osvaldo Licini, for instance, started from a realistic approach to then create a system of inner signs and figures closer to the intangible world of ideas. However, the passage from iconic to aniconic representation has always developed in this order and never in the opposite way.
What distinguishes this group of artists belonging to the Millennials generation is the recognition of the basic ambiguity of visual language and, therefore, the final dismissal of the dichotomy between abstraction and representation, a legacy from the past. It is clear that these categorizations are not functional anymore. It might be the consequence of a structural change in culture, regarding the emerging of a new awareness, more and more a-confessional in an ideological way. We may consider it as a legacy of the post-modern period, which helped to redefine genres making them liquid and supporting a free circulation of artist between various artistic fields. International critics testified this change, pushing authors like Tony Godfrey and Bob Nikas to rethink old classifications and introduce new elastic visions on present pictorial researches. Godfrey invented the definition of Ambiguous Abstraction, regarding those works by abstract artists where figurative traces survive in a evanescent way. Nikas expanded the Hybrid Picture definitionalso to those works by mainly figurative artists (like Jules de Balincourt and Wilhelm Sasnal) showing abstract elements.
In reality, Gerhard Richter's many and various works between abstraction and figuration already proved how painting could be considered as something homogeneous, regardless of its own declinations. In 1986, the American abstract painter Jonathan Lasker wrote: "I'm seeking subject matter, not abstraction." Lasker thought Abstraction was dead with Frank Stella's Black Paintings, so he imagined painting as representing marginal topics like memory, presence, matter, transcendence and the mix between high and low art. In addition to these topics, felt as crucial nowadays, the post- abstraction by the Millennials, shaped by the exponential growing of information and digital technology, reflects on the individual's position during image creation and fruition processes.
Studies on perception, at the core of artistic experimentations since the end of the Fifties, were one of the many consequences derived from the discoveries in quantum physics. The observer was given the power to influence the results of scientific experiments and, in an extended way, he could concretely define reality. Through the Uncertainty principle, the epistemological consequences of Werner Karl Heisemberg's theory would have been received also by contemporary arts, which started then a deep reflection on the observer's role in the construction of images. Optic and kinetic works were conceived as interactive devices able to create a physiological reaction into the observer, who became an active part in the understanding of the image. Artists considered themselves as aesthetic scientists with the social mission to show the audience how congnitive mechanisms work. To realize their goal, they had to make one step back and give up with the author principle, in the same way as the N Group from Padova did when their works were presented under a collective signature. After fifty years, at the peak of the digital era, studies on the relation between image and perception have reconceived or, at least, extended to the new cognitive standards of the Y generation. These young artists are not interested defining how visual mechanisms work, while they focus on the reactions to the changed fruition conditions to internet and virtual reality images. They developed a critical awareness to distinguish artistic creation from the production of commercial, advertisting and playful images. All the artists present in the exhibition show a radically individualistic approach in considering art as a cognitive tool and as a way to resist to the codes of mass-media communication and traditional storytelling systems. The abstraction choice has been immediate for some and gradual for others. It represents a precise wish to cut any connection with the invasion of media language (and not its technology) to re-establish a primary and creative connection with reality.
Abstract comes from the latin expression ab trahere and means "to remove", "to separate". It refers to that kind of mental action that moves from the concrete and immediate side of contigency to the one filtered by reflection. Abstraction and theory are comparable terms. They both include detachment from reality, even if in the Millennials' abstraction is only temporary. It has the same value of an epochè, a suspension of judgment towards the alleged truth of phenomena, which never resolves in a complete detachment from reality.
Paolo Bini, for example, translates physical (and mental) landscapes in abstract chromatic units, based on pixels and scanner or plotter timings. The artist paints on paper strips, then mounted on boards, canvases or walls to create images characterized by a rhythmical and chromatic partition. With paintings, installations and paint-sculptures, Bini builds a lyrical and personal variation of pattern painting, where geometrical precision and gestural urgency of abstract expressionism coexist. This emotional geometry, produced by the fusion between mental structures and phenomenical entities, places his painting style on the the thin border between visible and invisible, on the precise point where the act of observing nature fights with the creative distorsions of awareness.
The pictorial signs by Isabella Nazzarri may be defined as phyto-morphic and anatomorphic. Using an organic and perpetually changing alphabet, she expresses feelings, memories and intuitions incomprehensible in any other way. The artist gets inspiration from the classification of anatomical and herbal tables to build a world of evocative and fluctuating pictograms, obtained through a free interpretation of natural morphologies. Nazzarri realized a big mural painting on the gallery ceiling, a crowded organic genesis echoing the codified forms of her Innatural systems, an imaginative theory of amoebas and parameciums, bacteria and protozoans coming out from the primordial broth of an alien planet. Even if her artistic world is not influenced by science fiction, it represents the inner observation of an overabundance of archetypical forms, similar to terrestrial microbiologies generate by a mobile and liquid imagination.
Matteo Negri's research focuses on plastic substances in an eclectic way, in combination with stone and ceramic, metal and resin, using industrial varnishes to create pop colors for an immediate expressive efficiency. His varied production centers on the division between form and meaning, a short circuit of aesthetic content and substance. This is the case of Kamigami Box, big irregular boxes showing internal surfaces covered with mirroring steel. The surfaces reflect the Lego constructions on the sculpture's base ad infinitum, giving the impression of a limitless urban settlement. Together with a new Kamigami, the artist shows a piece of furniture, an old chest of drawers transformed in a displayer containing many little works. The visitors are invited to explore it, so they can experience an unusual form of artistic interaction.
The mechanisms of creation and image fruition are at the core of Patrick Tabarelli work. His works drive the observer towards a kind of perceptive uncertainty, thanks to their formal ambiguity. His paintings are made of flat, almost digital surfaces, or are crossed by dynamic and minimal oscillations, in contrast with the gestural origins of his style. Recently, his works focused on the construction of drawing machines, digital hardware and software for the production of surfaces, which look like hand-painted, so the ambiguity between author and work emerges once again.
Through his project NORAA (NOn Representational Art Automata), Tabarelli suggests a redefinition of the traditional concepts of author and autenticity of the work, on crisis because of the recent development and the new interactive possibilities introduced by digital and information technologies.
Viviana Valla elaborates the language of geometrical abstraction through unconventional substances, like recovery papers, post-it, tape and fragments of printed images. She invents an intimate dimension with the realization of a mysterious and enigmatic visual diary. All we do not see, such as the pictorial adjustments and the collage erased by the artist during the stratification process, is the skeleton of her work. The settled formal subjects partially emerge from the work's surface, they are part of a gradual rearrangement of chaotic elements through continuous additions and exclusions, negations and affirmations. The artist translates in a clear and extensive language the gathering of elusive thoughts, immediate ideas and sudden inspirations accompanying the creative act. The final result is a slow perception of soft colors and delicate tones, almost
monochromatic painting style, reducing lyrical and emotional distractions in a minimal and analytical world.
Giulio Zanet's painting style is based on the impossibility of objectifying thoughts ad emotions in a clear and linear system. His artistic career testifies a gradual moving from destructured figuration to a hybrid and polysemous abstraction, his language reflects the vague imprecision of existential experiences. Using the main codes of abstract tradition - analytical, informal, abstract expressionism and neo geo - he defines a basically mobile and uncertain style, alternating the rigour of pattern with the pleasure of decoration, the freedom of gesture with the imperfect disposition of signs on an instable and fragile balance between rules and transgression. Many of his recent works overcome the classic structure of painting and become abstract shapes. They are fragments of an omnivorous language, similar to an expanded texture, invading the envirnommental space to change invariably its own perceptive boundaries.